LCP
Largest Contentful Paint
1.89 s
good ≤ 2.50 s · poor > 4.00 s
AExcellent HTTP 200
Tech Auditor · Website audit for SEO, speed and security
https://tech-auditor.ny8.dev/Audit any URL with 150+ technical checks: SEO, performance, Core Web Vitals, security, accessibility, privacy and mobile, with the evidence and the fix.
- scanned
- duration
- 5.27 s
- requests
- ≈4
- page weight
- 285 KB
- ttfb
- 890 ms
Content Security Policy
See everything your website is hiding.
Every layer of the stack, weighted into one sco…
Measured, never guessed.
Recent scans
DMARC enforcement
Need these fixes handled?
NY8 · technical consulting and web development — from a prioritised plan to implementation.
- Failed
- 8
- Warnings
- 16
- Passed
- 114
- Checks
- 140
// the plan // checklist
The plan, as a checklist
92
audited: 92
grade A → A
0 of 24 fixed
0%
Tick an issue once it is fixed. Each tick counts that check as passed, and the score moves with it.
The top 3 alone would reach 94 · grade A.
Start here
the biggest gains, largest first0 / 3 fixed- 1
Content Security PolicySecurity
Start with a report-only policy, fix the violations, then enforce a script-src that avoids unsafe-inline.
+1.3
- 2
Security header coverage across site surfacesSecurity
Apply security headers in the outermost server or CDN layer so every route, redirect and error page inherits them.
+0.9
- 3
DMARC enforcementSecurity
Publish "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:…" to start collecting reports, then move to quarantine and reject.
+0.7
after that
0 / 5 fixed
- Clickjacking protectionSecurity+0.6
- X-Content-Type-OptionsSecurity+0.6
- Render-blocking resourcesPerformance+0.3
- Referrer-PolicySecurity+0.3
- Permissions-PolicySecurity+0.3
Module scores
Select a module to see its checks
Grade band
A
92/100
band 90–94
3 points to reach A+
F0–59
D60–69
C70–79
B80–89
A90–94
A+95–100
Scores are weighted across the eight categories shown in the report.
All checks
Every rule that ran, with its evidence and fix. Tick an issue as fixed and the checklist score moves with it.
// deep dive
Measurements and evidence
Core Web Vitals
Thresholds follow Google’s published good / needs-improvement / poor bands.
INP
Interaction to Next Paint
110 ms
good ≤ 200 ms · poor > 500 ms
CLS
Cumulative Layout Shift
0.030
good ≤ 0.100 · poor > 0.250
FCP
First Contentful Paint
1.74 s
good ≤ 1.80 s · poor > 3.00 s
TTFB
Time to First Byte
890 ms
good ≤ 800 ms · poor > 1.80 s
TBT
Total Blocking Time
7 ms
good ≤ 200 ms · poor > 600 ms
generated // checks run against tech-auditor.ny8.dev